User talk:Wondergirls

Feel free to leave me a message!! ^_^

November 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively here, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did with this edit to Talk:South Korea. You may wish to read the introduction to editing for more information about Wikipedia. Thank you. Say Headcheese!--hexa Chord ² 18:35, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User page...

Hi Wondergirls, I have deleted your user page. Copying and pasting an article without providing attribution to it's authors is a violation of the GNU Free Document License, and thus, copyright infringement. In any case, it's redundant to the article anyway. Why not just link to the page? ----J.S (T/C/WRE) 23:55, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

South Korea

I'd appreciate you using the talk page to discuss the changes that I made as opposed to just reverting them. You consistently add "Korea is better than..."-type of sentences, which are inappropriate, as you are picking and choosing the other countries pretty much randomly, in order to make South Korea look as good as possible. How would you feel if someone did that the other way? "South Korea's life expectancy ranks well below other Asian countries such as Japan and Singapore, as well as Australia, Iceland, and San Marino." Such picking-and-choosing of comparisons is ultimately non-neutral and inappropriate in an encyclopedic entry. KieferFL (talk) 03:20, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

REPLY FROM MY TALK PAGE: This is something that should be discussed in the open forum of the South Korea talk page. I have asked for discussion there since the first edit, and (here) on your talk page and you've ignored that request. You have now reverted these changes 3 times without discussion. I will be happy to discuss specific issues on the appropriate talk page. KieferFL (talk) 17:17, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In order to help with the discussion, I have taken the time to list the 36 changes that I made and given the reasons behind them on the South Korea talk page. If you would like to discuss why any of those changes should not be made after reading the reasoning, I would appreciate your response. KieferFL (talk) 20:15, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss your issues on the talk page. KieferFL (talk) 08:05, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, I remind you that the reasons behind the edits that you keep reverting are on the talk page. If you'd like to discuss them, I'd like to talk specifics with you. Please do not continue to blindly revert these edits. I am making these changes in order to improve the article. KieferFL (talk) 03:28, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Civility

I would suggest that making a revert based on your assumption of what someones nationality is, is unacceptable behaviour for wikipedia.

My edit was outlined in the talk page, and you have not addressed any of the issues/reasons behind the edit.

Go to the talk page, contribute politely, obtain consensus - and then make an edit.

Sennen goroshi (talk) 13:41, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Developed country. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Oda Mari (talk) 19:05, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion pages are always wide open for you

Why don't you use talk pages whenever you edit in a drastic/bold way? That would prevent you from being accused of various charges like vandalism. Regards.--Caspian blue 19:21, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

South Korea

Thank you for your interest in the South Korea page. Until recently the page was under protection due to rampant vandalism and edit-warring. Due to these problems and others the talk page for such a controversial article is especially important. Improvements to the article are welcome, but please feel free to post any proposals you have for improving the article on the Talk Page first. I realize that you disagree strongly with SennenGoroshi, but let's at least try to talk it out. If you check the "proposals" section you can find what I plan to improve, and my reasoning for the changes. RlndGunslinger (talk) 07:29, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

South Korea

can you please stop reinserting blatant POV into the South Korea article, so many people have pointed out the obvious bias on the article, it is NOT a promotional article for South Korea, it is a neutral article for wikipedia. カンチョーSennen Goroshi ! (talk) 14:40, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lakshmix

is Lakshmix also your account?

カンチョーSennen Goroshi ! (talk) 14:50, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ANI report

Perhaps you could view the report and give your side of things.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Blatant_personal_attack_and_racism

カンチョーSennen Goroshi ! (talk) 18:22, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

For this rascist personal attack, I have blocked you from editing for 3 days.

If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} CIreland (talk) 18:25, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]